It’s doubtful that any of the technicians, scientists, engineers and astronauts working feverishly to bring the crew aboard the damaged Apollo 13 spacecraft safely home in 1970 cared about each other’s politics during those six harrowing days.

They had to work together, innovate remedies, tap into colleagues’ knowledge and expertise and then act.

That’s exactly what occurred. The teamwork resulted in a successful return. The Odyssey command module carrying Jim Lovell, Jack Swigert and Fred Haise splashed down in the South Pacific, with the trio physically unfazed, aside from urinary tract infections.

It’s hard to imagine such collaboration happening in 2018. It’s rare to see people of different persuasions back each other to take on a problem, or right a wrong. A hint of that occurred this month.

Divisiveness certainly didn’t subside when the Trump administration’s “zero tolerance” immigration policy on the nation’s southern border led to little children being separated from families seeking asylum in the U.S. But the images and sounds of crying toddlers, housed in metal cages set off an outcry around the world.

It was the reaction from a vast majority of Americans — even in the usversus- them 21st-century climate — that showed hints of common beliefs among us. The long-respected polling by Quinnipiac University showed that two-thirds of Americans opposed the inhumane policy, intended to deter immigrants from coming to the U.S. through the frightening prospect of having their children taken away.

A secure border, coupled with decent avenues for people seeking a better life to immigrate to this “nation of immigrants,” is the generally accepted, ultimate goal, though divisions run deep throughout the population and in Congress on how to achieve that outcome.

Yet, a tactic that forcibly separates kids from families fleeing countries because of violence and oppression is not the right answer, and is morally wrong and contrary to America’s foundational values. More than 2,300 children have been taken from their parents at the United States-Mexico border and detained since early May, according to U.S. Border Patrol numbers cited by The Associated Press.

Importantly, the overwhelming revulsion to that policy has come from people who aren’t often politically aligned these days.

Opposition by the nation’s five living first ladies, both Democrats and Republicans, exemplified the diversity of the backlash against the family separations caused by the administration’s “zero tolerance” border crossing policy.

Rosalynn Carter recalled a visit to Thailand during her husband Jimmy’s presidency, when she encountered children separated from their parents while fleeing war in Cambodia. “The practice and policy today of removing children from their parents’ care at our border with Mexico is disgraceful and a shame to our country,” Carter told the Washington Post. Laura Bush said the current situation was “immoral.”

The response from many faith leaders, some of whom staunchly support Trump, included some agreement, too. Franklin Graham, who’s supported Trump’s presidency, told the Christian Broadcasting Network, the border separations were “disgraceful — it is terrible to see families ripped apart. And I don’t support that one bit.” The leadership team of the Sisters of Providence of Saint Mary-ofthe- Woods in Vigo County urged an end to the practice, which they called “abhorrent and inhumane.”

Several Republicans in Congress joined Democrats in condemning the practice.

Finally, Trump signed an executive order Wednesdayto end the separation of kids from families at the border, after insisting that only Congress could do so. As he signed it, the president said what

millions of Americans had already experienced while watching news of the border policy implementation. “I didn’t like the sight or the feeling of families being separated,” Trump said.

Republican Larry Bucshon, the Indiana congressman from the 8th District, told WIKY TV, “The president made the right decision. I’m against separating families for any reason at the border. It’s not the right policy. That being said, Congress needs to act, so we can follow the law.”

Division over the situation remains as deep as ever, of course. Though two-thirds of the country agreed with Bucshon, Laura Bush and Franklin Graham, another third of Americans either approved of the family separations tactic, or had no opinion. And, who knows what the mercurial Trump will do next, or whether Congress can address the multiple complexities of the immigration and border security issues.

But in this one dreadful instance, on this narrow topic, a lot of Americans agreed that a wrong needed to be righted and their voices led to a change.

© 2024 Community Newspaper Holdings, Inc.