City
officials have found a way around the Grant County Council after the
council’s failure to consent to the city’s bond deal with Central Indiana Ethanol last month.
The tax increment financing (TIF) deal will give Central Indiana
Ethanol $3.65 million for an expansion project on Ind. 18 and provide
for hundreds of thousands in annual TIF revenue to the City of Marion Redevelopment Commission from the TIF district.
The expansion project was outside Marion city limits, so the city had
needed approval from the County Council to move forward issuing the
bond. The County Council failed to muster enough votes for approval last
month, with two members abstaining because they sell grain to CIE.
Now the city’s financial advisers have changed the bond’s terms so they no longer need the county’s consent.
“They ran into a roadblock and they figured out a way around it. I
don’t begrudge them for being clever,” said County Council member Mike
Roorbach, who voted against the bond financing last month. “Politics is
the art of the possible … and they figured out a way to make it
possible.”
A memo from Buddy Downs of Ice Miller to members of the City Council
says the new deal works because it only allows CIE to spend bond
proceeds inside city limits.
“Because the County Council did not consent, we simply changed the
description of the project in the documents … to only permit the use of
the bond proceeds within the City. Therefore, the consent of the County
Council is no longer legally necessary,” Downs said.
The bond deal had needed County Council approval because the
expansion project is taking place on the former Omnisource property
which will be annexed into the City of Marion come Jan. 1, 2020 but is
currently outside city limits.
It’s not clear yet what the money will be spent on under the new
project description. Phone messages and emails to Downs and City
Attorney Tom Hunt went unanswered Friday afternoon.
City Council member Steve Henderson said he’s being asked to vote on the TIF deal without all the information he wants to have.
“They are supposed to supply an impact statement. … We haven’t seen
the financial statement of CIE either. If we could see that we would
probably see that they don’t need the money,” Henderson said.
He also questioned the urgency of passing the TIF deal.
“Why are we hurrying this through? I don’t understand why we’re rushing to get this done,” Henderson said.
CIE officials have said the push to make the deal happen is so that
the company can finish parts of the expansion in time for harvest.
“I’ve had my say so, I’ve said my piece. (The CIE bond) was not a big
issue for me, but the philosophy is a big issue for me. … Those are tax
dollars that should go into the tax coffers. That’s the whole problem
with TIF in general,” Roorbach said.
Henderson agreed. “Where’s our loyalty at here?” he asked, saying the
tax dollars could be going to fund public safety, for example.
With County Council out of the way, the City Council vote on Tuesday is the last hurdle to approval.