Drawing number 37, the men had a few nervous moments – but when one of your top 10 offices is considered bottom 10 by everyone else, success is assured. The first nine offices on the list were quickly snapped up, but the Nebraska Air Force men left feeling they’d gotten a plum in Longworth 1516.
Dreiling strives for perspective as visitors to his personal office crack wise about the view from his window. It’s a courtyard -- a courtyard with a view of the Longworth cafeteria’s roof, elevator shaft exteriors and rows of office windows.
“Some people might go, ‘Oh, look at that boring view,’” he said, gazing at it. “I look out there and go, ‘Wow, I have sunlight.’ When I was in the military, I never had sunlight, and I never had windows.”
Only a few thousand people work in Congress. It’s a fact of which Dreiling reminds himself daily.
“Serving up here in Washington is a privilege and a sacred trust,” he said. “It’s a very unique opportunity afforded to not a lot of people. I’m just lucky to be here at all.”
‘It’s entirely up to you’
The Senate, where members serve six-year terms, divvies up its 100 offices in a significantly slower process with far fewer moves but with a similar result: The most senior members get the best spaces.
If the idea is to score one of the best suites in the House, patience helps, too.
With elections held every two years, the lower chamber’s senior members gradually work their way up to its largest suites as other members die, resign or get ousted. That can create a ripple effect. One office switch begets another, as the most senior member who wants that representative’s former office gets it.
It’s one way representatives announce their status, said a former House member who didn’t want to be named.
“It’s probably like sitting on the bench on a basketball team where they put you on the bench, and you sit close to the coach or down at the end,” the former member said. “A lot of those people, the only reason they move is because it seems more prestigious.”
Every new House member has to have a workspace. But upgrading to a nicer office means Capitol work crews move stacks of furniture, boxes, computers, phones and electronics – and public money gets spent – on the say-so of a single member of Congress.
“You can vote against an appropriations bill, but if your other 434 (House) colleagues say yes, well, you’re out of luck. But it’s entirely up to you to decide whether to trade up an office if one is offered to you,” said Pete Sepp, president of the D.C.-based watchdog group the National Taxpayers Union.
Presiding over the massive shift of departing members out of their offices and new and veteran members into those offices is the Architect of the Capitol, a $733.7 million-dollar administrative agency that oversees the Capitol complex.
But it’s a challenge to get answers from the agency about the total cost of the weeks-long biennial House office reshuffling.
The Washington Post reported in 2010 that then-Architect Steven T. Ayers “wouldn’t say how much this whole process of moving and painting offices costs.” In 2016, the agency would not give Roll Call a list of available House offices.
The Architect’s Office responded to fresh inquiries about the House office reshuffling’s costs by saying those costs are scattered across more than one agency in the $4 trillion-plus federal budget. So the Architect’s Office doesn’t know what they are. Several email and phone messages to the agency went unanswered.
But it is possible to get some idea of the scale of the endeavor.
A review of congressional directories indicates about 240 of 435 House members plus delegates are in the same offices they occupied in 2015-16. That accounts for a handful of recently departed members who didn’t move between terms. The remaining offices are occupied by new members or members who “upgraded” to new offices.
Making a projection based on anecdotal evidence, annual reports and historical congressional testimony by the Architect’s office, the National Taxpayers Union has pegged the total costs of the office reshuffling at between $1 million and $1.5 million biennially.