By J.K. Wall, The IBJ
jwall@ibj.com
For Conseco Inc., it's a painful paradox. Soon-to-retire baby boomers
need insurance to pay for nursing home and inhome care in their later years.
Conseco sells
that coverage, called long-term-care insurance. But right now, it wishes it
didn't. The
Carmel-based company has been losing millions of dollars a month on
long-term-care policies, as the costs of providing care have outstripped the
premiums collected. Conseco
also is facing lawsuits and an investigation by a congressional committee into
whether it wrongly denied customers' claims under its long-term-care policies.
The
troubles have kept Conseco's stock price depressed,
furthering speculation that the company might be acquired. "It's
certainly possible, and I'm hopeful. I wish somebody would," said Mark Foster,
chief investment officer at Kirr Marbach & Co. in Columbus, Ind. His firm
owns 488,000 Conseco shares. And
yet here's another paradox: The biggest hindrance to investors' buying more
shares or to an acquirer's buying the whole company, Foster said, is uncertainty
over Conseco's long-term-care business. "It's
hard to believe that it's going to be worse," he said. "But I
don't think anybody's got their arms around it and knows what it's going to be."
One
reason no one knows is that losses on its long-term-care policies have been a
problem for Conseco since co-founder Steve Hilbert was still CEO. Conseco
inherited most of its long-term-care policies from companies it scooped up in
the 1990s in an acquisition spree. Today,
Conseco sells long-term-care policies through its Chicago-based subsidiary,
Bankers Life & Casualty Co. Another subsidiary, the Carmel-based Conseco
Insurance Group, manages older policies but no longer sells new ones.
Both
units suffered losses on longterm-care policies last year. Conseco's
elderly customers have been hanging on to those policies longer and filing more
expensive claims than expected. Those trends forced Conseco to spend $100
million in the last nine months to shore up its reserves to cover the ongoing
claims. The
company has also pushed regulators for tens of millions in price hikes to stop
the bleeding of cash. As of May 1, Conseco had won 62 percent of the rate
increases it has sought. Cost
cutting Conseco
is trying to save money by strengthening its computer systems, improving its
customer service and paying its claims more accurately. To help with those
efforts, it consolidated its long-term-care administration teams under one
executive last year. So
far, Conseco has shaved $4 million in costs. It wants to save another $6
million. "Those
are very significant improvements that have taken place," said Conseco spokesman
Tony Zehnder. "We are making measurable progress." Conseco's
stock has dropped slightly in the last year, even after a nice rally during the
last four weeks. It now trades for about $20, down from more than $24 this time
last year. That
depressed value has led many to peg Conseco as a likely buyout target. In May,
Barron's magazine named Conseco as potential takeover bait for a large life
insurer, such as American International Group, Prudential Financial or
MetLife-all of which have loads of cash to spend. Or
some think a private equity firm might buy Conseco and make it a private
company. Private equity firms have recently agreed to buy such companies as
Warsaw-based Biomet Inc. and the Chrysler unit of Germany's DaimlerChrysler.
Jukka
Lipponen, an insurance analyst at Keefe Bruyette & Woods in Connecticut,
said a private equity deal is the only one that makes sense, but that it's still
unlikely. A
long list of insurers has stopped selling long-term-care policies in recent
years. "People
that have already stopped selling long-term care, why would they buy back into
it?" Lipponen asked. They
might because of the large number of potential customers. Eight
million Americans own a longterm-care policy, according to the American
Association for Long-Term-Care Insurance. But that number could balloon as 75
million baby boomers enter their 60s. The Census Bureau expects one in nine of
them to live to at least age 90. Congressional
scrutiny On
May 24, Rep. John D. Dingell, D-Michigan, launched an investigation into how
Conseco and another long-term-care insurer, Penn Treaty American Corp, treated
their customers. Dingell
sent a letter to Conseco CEO C. James Prieur, noting that Conseco's rate of
complaints on its long-term care is higher than that of its peers. Dingell
demanded that Conseco produce documents that detail its claims-handling polices
and practices. Conseco
issued a written statement, saying, "We agree that every long-term-care
policyholder deserves
assurance that their claim will be handled timely and in accordance with the
terms of their contract. We look forward to working with the committee to
complete a thorough and fair review." Conseco
officials also noted the insurer paid out $600 million in claims last year and
had a denial rate of less than 2 percent. Insurers
are wresting with long-termcare policies in part because they're a relatively
new product. Long-term
care was not sold widely until the late-1980s. At
that time, insurance actuaries tried to put a price on the policies, but they
had scant data to tell them how costly the claims would be. So long-term-care
policies have been chronically underpriced. The
holders of long-term-care insurance haven't canceled them or cashed them out
nearly as often as life and health insurance policyholders do. The cost of
medical care has spiraled. And life insurance companies haven't earned as much
on their investments as they had hoped. All
three factors have conspired to generate less revenue than expected and yield
more payouts than predicted. "Basically,
all of the early industry products were mispriced," Lipponen said.
Conseco
bought into the long-term care business in a big way when it acquired Transport
Holdings Inc. and American Travellers Corp. in 1996. The next year, Conseco
acquired more long-term business when it bought Washington National Insurance
Co. As
early as April 2000, Conseco reported that its rate of claims in long-term care
had surged. It said then it was seeking rate hikes from regulators and trying to
sell more profitable products.
In
2002, Conseco spent $110 million to shore up its reserves for long-term-care
policies-just before it entered bankruptcy reorganization. After
it emerged from bankruptcy in September 2003, Conseco appeared to have its
long-term-care policies under control. But in its third quarter of last year,
Conseco's rate of losses spiked on its older long-term-care policies. That
segment lost $13 million. In
its next two quarters, those losses only worsened. Mark
Finkelstein, an analyst at Cochran Caronia Waller Securities, wrote in a note to
investors last month, "Our best guess is the worst is behind the company, but
volatility is likely to continue throughout the business."
Copyright © 2025 All Rights Reserved.